Earth's Circumference In Nautical Miles
$\begingroup$
The circumference of the Earth has been measured to be $twoscore,075 \,\pu{km}$, which is only $21 \,\pu{km}$ from $40,096 = 2^{12}$. For reference, $40,075 \approx 2^{11.992}$. This is probably a foreign coincidence, but originally a meter was ready to be $1/x,000,000$-th of the altitude from the North Pole to the Equator, then maybe in that location is a mathematical explanation.
Fred
21.9k 5 gold badges 45 argent badges 87 bronze badges
asked Apr 24 at 13:53
LMolLMol
67 ane argent badge 2 bronze badges
$\endgroup$
3
2 Answers 2
$\begingroup$
Well, as others have pointed out nosotros're a little off from $2^{12}$ kilometers. However, there is no coincidence that our world'southward circumference is close to $40000$ kilometers. From Wikipedia:
The metre was originally defined in 1793 as one 10-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole forth a great circle, then the Earth'southward circumference is approximately 40000 km.
answered April 24 at xviii:08
Oscar LanziOscar Lanzi
ii,716 five silver badges xiii bronze badges
$\endgroup$
ane
-
$\begingroup$ Additional annotate on this: another value that is not a coincidence is 21600=360*lx nautical miles, since the nautical mile originally measured a infinitesimal = 1/60 degree of breadth (or longitude at equator) $\endgroup$
Apr 25 at 18:34
$\begingroup$
There'southward something wrong with your math, $2^{12} \ = \ 4096$:
$two^x \ = \ forty\ 000$
$\therefore x\log2 \ = \ \log\ forty\ 000$
$\therefore ten \ = \ \frac{\log\ 40000}{\log\ 2}$
$\therefore x \ = \ 15.28771$
Thus, $2^{xv.28771} \ = \ 40\ 000$
answered April 24 at 17:38
FredFred
21.9k 5 gold badges 45 silver badges 87 bronze badges
$\endgroup$
0
Earth's Circumference In Nautical Miles,
Source: https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/23762/is-it-a-coincidence-that-the-circumference-of-the-earth-in-kilometers-is-almost
Posted by: weaverdecroure.blogspot.com
$\begingroup$ $2^{12}$ is 4096 not 40,096 $\endgroup$
Apr 24 at 23:04
$\begingroup$ @uhoh Is information technology a coincidence that your proper name perfectly fits to the comment $\endgroup$
Apr 26 at half dozen:23
$\begingroup$ So what is that in low-cal years? Still a coincidence? $\endgroup$
Apr 27 at 0:44